Obama, the Messiah

I know Obama is a racist, a liar, a bigot, a crook and a socialist. Nothing new there. (Proof: racist - multiple insulting stereotyping comments in his books, liar - any one of a number of lies such as his promise to use public funds for his campaign, bigot - his clinging to guns and bibles comments, crook - number 2 recipient of fannie mae money etc. , socialist - his spread someone else's wealth comments) But so is McCain, and most other politicians. But I have never seen a candidate built up as a Messiah before. I had heard this on some talk shows etc. but it wasn't until I actually looked at the Obama website that I fully realized it.

I read about Obama's tax plans since I make more than the ever-shrinking amount above which I will be allowed to share my wealth with the rest of you scum. Over and over, the website says "Obama will" do such-and-such. Typically, there is a modicum of modesty in these kinds of things. Something like 'Senator Obama will work with Congress to change your taxes'. That kind of thing, noting that there are other people in government besides Obama. But not on Obama's site. "Obama will ask the wealthiest 2% of families to give back a portion of the taxes they have received over the past eight years to ensure we are restoring fairness and returning to fiscal responsibility." Never mind that this is obfuscation of the highest order and an incredibly insulting and twisted way of making it look like raising my taxes (but not yours) is fair. Never mind that the money is mine - not the government's - and that lower tax rates are not the government giving me money (unlike the majority of you bums reading this who are on the dole via bogus disability, medicaid, food stamps, medicare, social security, welfare, rent subsidies and the rest). Note the use of the words "Obama will". The liberal scum (nothing personal, but I have to use something descriptive to differentiate you from the rare democrat or liberal who isn't trying to steal from me) are trying to turn B. Hussein Obama into a one word title like "Sting" or "Oprah". And they are glorifying Obama. Try this quote, "Obama will pay for this tax relief ...". B. Hussein Obama will not pay for anything; neither will you. I will. Since I and others like me pay 90% of the taxes already.

Anyway, you can't help read the B. Hussein Obama website without coming away with chills of fear at the ego of this evil man and his deluded supporters.

And just for fun, a few predictions. B. Hussein Obama will (via a democratic congress)... 1) Raise taxes on just about everyone (except the 40% who already pay no tax) 2) He will raise capital gains (thus insuring that the recession stays longer) 3) He will void laws restricting abortion in any way 4) He will cancel religious tax deductions 5) He will restore the 'fairness doctrine' 6) He will take up where Clinton left off with sicking the IRS on anyone and any organization that opposes him 7) He will never allow access to his college records or birth records (which, according to credible allegations, will show him ineligible to be President since he is not a native-born American, but rather a Kenyan who was rushed to the US after his birth). 8) He will force churches and various non-liberal tax-exempt organizations to pay taxes 9) He will promote marriage based on nothing more than a shared perversion 10) He will appoint hundreds of judges quickly (since there is a large back-log of open positions kept that way by the democrats and the sell-out traitorous rat and his "gang" McCain) who will legislate from the bench so many environmental wacko rulings that mineral and oil exploration will essentially cease forever. 11) These judges will force the Boy Scouts to cease to exist in the form we know today. 12) Those who practice various perversions will be forced in all of the above organizations with the threat of government persecution 13) He will force the military to accept faggots or whatever other name is politically correct these days. 14)He will infringe and remove gun-rights 15) He will completely socialize medicine. (It's already mostly socialized) 16) He will fund college education for those he favors (undeserving scum of various types) at tax-payer expense. 17) Amnesty for 20-40 million criminal aliens and the arrival of an equal number of new immigrants which will turn Texas and several other states into blue states for the foreseeable future and never again let conservatives even come close to having a say in national politics. And I predict he will do even worse things that I'm not even able to imagine. We'll see during the next 8 years, won't we?

And another note, remember that last election not a single incumbent democrat lost a race for Congress - not one. And in case you think the Republicans will save us, McCain is responsible for the limitation of our freedom preventing free speech by taking out ads that mention candidates, responsible for the prevention of conservative judges being appointed and the party leaders selected him by keeping the nomination process controlled via the same early states who have open primaries and the like. Nothing has changed. If the republican party was serious and fair, they would let the largest red state, Texas, go first, or rotate the primaries so everyone would get a chance to go early. Not gonna happen.

And a last prediction - If God does have a covenant relationship with this country like the Pilgrims, Christians, Manifest Destiny believers of the 19th and 20th centuries and Mormons believe, then he's gonna wipe us out - for our and the world's sake - and it ain't gonna be pretty.

Dressing Up a Pig

John McCain is a liberal who doesn't deserve to be President any more than B. Hussein Obama. They both have almost identical policies. War? They are both saying that we will keep a presence in Iraq and draw down. They may quibble about how many troops and how fast, but they both have the same position. Abortion? Both are pro-abortion based on their voting records - though Obama would allow infanticide too. Spending? Both are for it for various reasons. Cuts in government? Neither has any plans for this.

But McCain (the pig I'm referring to in the title) has dressed himself up by picking Palin. Palin seems to be a pretty good conservative. Pro-life. But McCain is still the top guy and Palin will have to support him, not McCain supporting Palin and conservatives.

Palin has shown some conservative opinions but I look at her treatment of marriage based on nothing more than a shared perversion as a harbinger of the future. When the black-robed minions of hell in Alaska ruled in favor of marriage based on nothing more than a shared perversion, she knuckled under - just like Mitt Romney in Massachussets. She said that she had to enforce their ruling and made it legal.

The truth is that the courts have no power to enforce their rulings. Purposely, they are dependent on the executive branch for enforcement. And the executive branch, which should be co-equal (actually superior because they are chosen directly by the people and given enforcement powers) with the judicial in a shared power system, can not be told what to do by the judges any more than the executive can tell the judges how to rule. That should be a basic and fundamental principle known by everyone. Palin surrendered. And I'm afraid she will do likewise to McCain and his handlers.

I'm also troubled by Palin's young children including a baby with Down's. That baby needs a mother in the home. I know, I know, it's infuriating to see femi-nazi's like Steinem and Quinn tell Palin to go home when they have always said that women should not be tied down by family obligations. Of course they are hypocritical in the extreme. But, are they right?

Yes, they are - and you know it. So aren't the Repub's also being hypocritical when they trash Steinem and company and say that Palin's children don't need a full-time mother? You tell me.

You know, the whole mother in the home debate was never about whether women could perform on the job. Any idiot knows that they can. The point in question was ( and is ) what is best for the children? Either a mother matters or she doesn't and then whatever you can get for 4 dollars an hour will do just fine, as long as they are licensed by the state childhood nazis.

Anyway, no matter what color of dress you put on the pig, it's still just a pig.

And one more story from Abraham Lincoln to illustrate the point: Question: If you call a tail a leg, how many legs does a sheep have? Answer: Five. Reply: No, because calling a tail a leg doesn't make it one. And in case you don't get it, McCain is not a conservative, and adding a conservative "tail" (VP) doesn't make him one.

Some Thoughts on Operation Gladio

I had a Bishop while I was at BYU who had a son who had been blown up in a terrorist attack on a train station in Italy in 1978. (Bologna?) Poor old Bishop Garold Davis, Chairman of the English and Language Department, had been working to get this son back to full activity in the LDS church (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints). The son was travelling through Europe during a summer when there were lots of terrorist bombings. I spent that same summer in Europe and was always running into problems like being turned back from going into Spain due to the Basque terrorists blowing up the tracks. The Italian Communists were particularly nasty. This poor kid wondered why he was nearly killed if he was living a good life. The old "why do bad things happen to good people" question. Terrorists suck.

Turns out that many of the acts of terrorism that summer of discontent were actually driven by the US government via the CIA and Operation Gladio. The CIA had stashes of arms and lots of agents in place in almost every European Country in case of take-over by the Russians. At least that was the plan. In practice, there were committed people who would follow almost any order that would hurt the communists. Now exactly who ordered what and why is murky and will never be known, but what is clear is that in Italy, most if not all of the bombings were done by these forces of Operation Gladio. So Bishop Davis' son was nearly killed by the US government.

Now most of you reading this will not believe it. Or at least you will never have heard of this. It's fairly common knowledge in Europe. You can find lots of mentions of it in the various hard-core conspiracists like Alex Jones' Infowars and the like, but most people have been taught that these are tin-foil hat wearing kooks. Look it up yourself. Read John Berendt's (author of Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil) book on Venice "The city of Falling Angels". It has a few pages on the prosecutor who unearthed and made public much of the Italian information, though it was well-known to government and spy services.

The point of these assasinations was to make them look like they were done by the communists so that public opinion would turn against the communists and also, and more importantly, to make people stop questioning shady government doings since the stakes were so high and the world was so dangerous. These are called "false flag" operations. There are lots of them, and we probably don't even know most of them. One of the most notorious was the nuclear attack on Hawaii by Russia on March 7, 1969. You say you haven't heard of it? Look it up. The russians got a Chinese sub and launched a nuclear missile at Hawaii to try and get us and China into a war. The missile blew up on launch. Why does almost no one know this?

Again, don't believe me; Look it up for yourselves. But what I find fascinating and scary is the response that people have to this kind of information. Most of you will think I'm a kook and stop reading. And that will be that. You will block this out each time you hear it and tell yourself that you read this kooky stuff before and it's all nonsense. Most people will nod when you say this and you can all feel good together as you call everyone else kooks.

And that's why the world is not only in such bad shape, but will keep getting worse.

A few will look into this. Since it is certain and true, it will actually be quite easy to learn this. Then the majority of these will shrug their shoulders and turn on Oprah Winfrey.

A very few will use this information to guide their political behavior. They will stop voting Democrat and Republican since both parties have the same policies - though the Republicans talk as if they don't. And then these people will be marginalized. They and their children will be ignored and mistreated. People will say incredibly insulting things without thinking because they are just kooks after all.

Why?

Doesn't the truth matter anymore? It is as if most of the world is unable to join action to knowledge. You can take someone and prove this kind of stuff to them. You can show them reputable sources. You can even get them to say that these things are evil and we need to change the government and hold the criminals responsible. And then they will vote for bigger government and more welfare benefits by electing the same criminals as long as the criminals keep promising more plunder for the voter.

Look this one up too. The recent Chinese earthquakes either cause or were caused by massive explosions in the chinese nuclear facilities. Check it out. There are pictures of massive concrete chunks coming up from underground facilities. Why do you think the Chinese kept everyone out? Why do you think they mobilized tens of thousands of troops to these areas? Again, don't believe me. Check it out yourself.

Why isn't this on every newpaper, TV program and everyone's lips?

I have no good advice to the novice to this kind of information. It is like taking a punch to the gut if you are an average patriotic American. If you are the average liberal American, your eyes will gloss over and you will turn back on your TV and put that B. Hussein Obama sticker on your car. Again, I have no advice for you. You can try and educate those around you but you will even find your loved ones eyes gloss over and they change the subject. How 'bout those Cowboys?

We have been lied to, indoctrinated, murdered and cheated for nearly a hundred years by our own government. And that is not going to change anytime soon.

But there is a just God who watches over human affairs. Many Americans from the Pilgrims on down to the Mormons have the idea of a covenantal relationship between the inhabitants of this land and God. And if we as a nation break this covenant, all deals are off.

As we sink into the abyss, we can live our lives as best we can - we can try and teach those around us to see with clear eyes - we can prepare for coming problems by getting out of debt and storing some food and supplies - and we can pray for deliverance. But I have a sinking suspicion that deliverance will only come to those who deserve it, and we as a nation have little right to expect it living as we are.

I watched on the news here in Utah about a car dealer who was told that collecting the rain from the roof of his showroom and storing it so he could use it to wash cars was illegal. Government even owns the waters that falls from heaven. Can it be much longer before Government believes it even owns and controls heaven?

Think about what I've said. Then join the John Birch Society and the Constitutional Party and other such organizations. Maybe it's not too late. But if it is, and I fear it is, maybe we can at least stir up a little trouble before the end. Whatever that may be. Vincet Veritas and Long Live the Republic!

Liberals shedding their sheep's clothing

In just the few days since the election, the gloves have come off and the democrats aren't even bothering to pretend they are conservative. Unlike the Republicans who were so reticent about using their power, the Democrats have no such compunction.

Quite a few Republican commentators are blathering about how Americans are still conservative. Oh yeah? Says who? They voted in a rogues gallery of committee chairmen from Rangel to Waters to Conyers. They rejected marriage protection in "conservative" Arizona and barely passed it in other states. They lost abortion restrictions in South Dakota. They lost Missouri's cloning/stem-cell debacle. Even attorney generals like the one in Kansas who actually came out publicly with a conservative stand went down in flames. And haven't school boards who were for intelligent design all lost? I could go on and on. How can the same commentators who thought the Republicans would do ok, continue to keep their heads in the sand and pretend that there is not an on-going shift in demographics?

The only thing they can turn to are polls which are notoriously easy to bias just by how you ask or preface a question. In an America where real freedom of speech has gone the way of the dodo (Did you ever hear a single Republican candidate point out that homosexual behavior is wrong, immoral, or perverted?), people often answer polling questions based on how they wish to be perceived, not how they truly believe. Take the black exit polls for example. Almost 100% claim to vote Democratic but 15-20% actually vote Republican in black districts. But you would never know by asking. The reason is the conservative blacks have (correctly) observed that saying they voted Republican and being found out or overheard will lead to persecution for them and their families.

Well that same principle works in reverse. People recognize that conservative positions are inherently fair and moral. It is wrong, for example, to steal - even if such theft comes by government forced legal plunder and taxation. They know this deep in their waffling hearts. And so they will all claim to be for lower spending. But when it comes time to actually say that less money needs to be spent on welfare, they run screaming from the camera that they are "compassionate" conservatives (a la GWB- thanks a lot for nothing.) and really have no intention of cutting spending. And we will see more and more of this as the liberals consolidate their power. The liberals have controlled the cultural institutions of this country for way too long to expect anything different in the future. Have you seen the numbers on conservative versus liberal in the under 30 crowd? Shudder if you haven't, because they look really, really bad. With liberals in control of print and television media, arts, literature, education of all levels, main-stream religion and almost everything else you can think of, there is no source for people to learn conservatism. Do you really think your average 18 year old listens to talk radio? So there is no prospect for change and the Republicans utterly failed to advance conservative ideas, being too caught up in molesting boys, spending money, and making crooked deals to actually try and educate the public. And so the self-labelling polls where more voters call themselves "conservative" than "liberal" are really meaningless.

And to return to the true colors of the Democrats: 1) Hillary has restored socialized medicine 2) Democrats are already talking of raising taxes (under the guise of fiscal responsibility) 3)Pelosi's constituents are already drooling over impeachment prospects 4) Iraq being abandoned is just a matter of when - not if (And I agree on this point. No reason to waste american lives if we're not going to fix the problem which would require some really heavy fighting and casualties. I just point this out to show that the Democrats are liars who just pretended they weren't going to surrender in Iraq) 5)Unindicted Abscam co-conspirator Murtha is being pushed for head of Heimatland Sicherheit (homeland security in German) - and so much for the 'fight corruption' lies of the Democrats. 6) Any conservative like Bolton will never be confirmed. And the list goes on and on.

And just a word on spineless republicans - They still control both houses. Why don't they confirm Bolton and about 10,000 ultra-conservative judges? What do they have to lose? They've already lost their jobs, their political power and their souls. Satan's hellfire awaits and the flames are growing higher. Why not go out with a bang? But you know and I know that they are morally bankrupt and fit only for being opposing political commentators on some political show that comes on at 2 AM.

Vincet Veritas, MEB

Former Representative Kolbe of Arizona representative of why Republicans lost

Here's a link to an article about Rep. Kolbe of Arizona in my local newspaper - http://activepaper.olivesoftware.com/daily/Skins/StandardEx/navigator.asp?skin=StandardEx&BP=OK
Go to page 11 for the article.

"In Arizona, retiring GOP Rep. Jim Kolbe said he hopes the Republican losses “cause a serious reexamination of our party’s roots and directions.” Kolbe, who has held his seat for 22 years, will be succeeded by Giffords. “If Republicans are to provide leadership for our country, we must get back to the fundamentals of our party — an emphasis on national security, fiscal discipline, reducing government’s role in our daily lives, embracing immigrants from other parts of the world, and a commitment to economic growth through lower taxes and increased trade,” he said."

Now Kolbe is a perfect example of why Republicans lost. He is a leader in a party of cultural conservatism that is pro-family. And yet he was practicing perversion (homosexual behavior) in the closet. And just as bad, he was corrupt (currently under investigation). No wonder the Republicans lost - they were (and are) a party of hypocrites. Kolbe has a lot of nerve making comments on what Republicans need to do. I have a suggestion for him and others like him - keep your pants on, stay away from boys, and don't be a crook. Now that's not too much to ask, is it?

And even worse, Kolbe is still stirring up trouble by trying to keep the Republicans doing all the things that lost them the election. Yes, "national security" is important. Maybe that's why we should have never gone in Iraq, which was not a threat to the US and the arabs could take care of themselves if Saddam tried invading Kuwait, Saudi Arabia or the Gulf States. And if they didn't resist, well that's too bad for them, but why should I send my son and my taxes over there if they won't even defend themselves? And from a cynical point of view, who cares which thug sells us oil? Saddam is a mass murderer, no doubt. And an evil man. But why should the US have to do something about it? And Hussein was a counter-balance to worse nut-cases in Iran. Yes, Rep. Kolbe, it is time to care about American Security - not world, not European, not Middle East - but American Security. And Kolbe still doesn't get it.

"Fiscal discipline" is also important. That's why the party that hugely expanded the welfare state through things like buying drugs for the senior crowd (the demographic group with the highest disposable income) paid for by borrowing and taxing young, working families who have the least disposable income deserved to lose. The Republicans actually managed to do worse than the Communists - they didn't take from the haves to give to the have-nots - they took from the have-nots and gave to the rich.

"Reducing government's role" is also a worthy goal. Too bad, Rep. Kolbe didn't practice what he's preaching. He and others like him including GWB have vastly increased government's power. Just look at how much of recent job growth is due to increase in size of government. And all this "growth" is actually a net loss to the economy because government workers produce nothing useful. They only produce paperwork and restrictions on the rest of us.

"Embracing immigrants" is exactly what lost Kolbe's successor the primary election. Is Kolbe mentally deficient? Never mind that the demographics of the criminal aliens are 85% liberal. Kolbe must think Republicans are idiots. (Well, actually he's right, because they kept electing him for 22 years) Americans oppose immigration 2 to 1 right now. How would adopting a position contrary to the wishes of Americans help the Republican party? (And remember this guy was a Republican leader - no wonder they lost)

"Lower taxes" are also a great idea but how about lower spending? Again, Kolbe demonstrates that the Republican leadership just doesn't get it.

And last "increased trade". Kolbe is off base on this one also. What he really means is importing more foreign-made goods and exporting American manufacturing and jobs. And the Republicans should be against this - not for it. If there is any hope for Republicans (and I don't think there is or they would be saying different things) this issue alone may hold promise of wresting control back from the Democrats. If the Republicans would equalize the playing field by imposing hefty tariffs and limiting our balance of trade, they could appeal to the blue-collar Democratic middle class that voted so heavily Democratic. But as long as GWB is President, this won't happen, so I expect a worse loss of Republicans in the house in the next election. Yes, you heard it first from me - I predict the Democratic margin in the House will go up - not down - in the next election because there is no sign that the Republican leadership has learned anything.

Vincet Veritas, MEB

Conservative Loser, and proud of it.

The Democrats have kicked Republican butt. No doubt about it. They've taken the House back by pretty much the same margin that the Republicans previously held. It appears that they've taken the Senate or at least tied. That makes GWB a lame duck for the next two years. I don't see any other way to spin it. What does that mean to a conservative?

First of all, conservatism is not the same as republicanism. These two have diverged more widely with each passing year, especially since GWB was elected. Conservatism is for smaller government. Republicanism is not.

How can I say that? Well, actually it's pretty easy to show. Look at the budget for one. It is ballooning worse under Bush than Clinton - even if you subtract out war expenses. Bush removed the conservative plank from the Republican platform about removing the Department of Education first thing. The conservative position on that department, part of the platform since Reagan, was that this kind of fuzzy socialism was wrong, was wasteful, and was not authorized by the Constitution and therefore was un-constitutional

That one action of Bush, accepted by the Republican party hacks, should have forced every conservative to head for the lifeboats and abandon ship (or the Republican party). Because this was a major shift in philosophy. Bush led the Republicans to abandon their strict constitutional constructionism for the vague liberal idea usually described by the politically correct term "living constitution". Living meaning that anyone could interpret the Constitution any way they wanted - basically a moral relativism idea. And once you accept that idea, the floodgates of relativism are opened, the argument of limited government is lost, and the only thing to be settled is how quickly to allow the government to become completely socialized. (Kind of like the old conversation attributed to Churchill or Shaw or others. Churchill asks socialite, "Would you sleep with me for a million dollars" Socialite: "I rather think I would" Churchill "Well here's 10 dollars then" Socialite: What kind of woman do you think I am. Churchill: "We've already established that - now, we're just haggling over price.")

And so, as a conservative, I view the loss of the Republicans with mixed emotions. They haven't really represented me for years. But where else does a conservative go?

Well, I threw my vote away this election on the Constitutional Party. Not that it makes a difference in Republican haven Utah. But at least I voted for candidates whose ideas are conservative. I also enjoyed voting no for the retention of every judge - especially the judge caught on a rant against deer hunters here in Utah. (She actually was turned out of office. You can find a video of her on Youtube.) But third parties stand the proverbial snowball-in-hell chance of winning at present.

The only other thing of interest in the election was a state school board race between a give-more-money-to-the-same-people-who-screwed-up-education candidate, and a candidate who at least gave lip service to "new ideas" - which I assume is code for tuition vouchers. He lost.

But, even though I can't bring myself to shed many tears about Republicans losing, the only argument I could see to voting Republican in a race that mattered was the leadership of the Democratic party that would now be in charge of the House as a whole, and the committees. Intelligence will be headed by Alcee Hastings - yes that Alcee Hastings. The impeached former judge who took bribes. Woo hoo! That-a-way Americans who voted Democratic! I have no words to express my disgust for this guy, and worse for the Americans who put him in this position. I can only comment that anything that happens is exactly what we deserve.

And isn't it fascinating that one of the Democrat election tactics was to point out corruption of Republicans? And then you put a convicted criminal in charge of Intelligence. There are two lessons here. 1. Americans are really, really, really stupid. 2. The Republicans hardly uttered a peep against corruption in the Democrats showing that they were morally bankrupt and worn out.

And then there is John Conyers of Michigan. Read some of his trash. If this is a guy that most Americans want in charge then we deserve the coming disasters.

Henry Waxman of California is another Marxist in liberal clothing.

Ditto Charles Rangel of New York. These guys who will head important committees are so ultra-liberal that even if I'm not heartbroken over the loss of the Republicans, I have this sinking pit in my stomach regarding America and its future.

The list goes on and on. And then there is new speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi - uber-liberal and head of the socialists in the Congress. She doesn't even hide her socialism as she is head of one of the socialist caucus groups. Who would have thought that a socialist would be third in line for the Presidency of the USA? (Of course, VP Henry Wallace was a socialist under Roosevelt, but that is out of the memory of most Americans.)

And so, just as the Republicans aren't conservatives, the Democrats really aren't Democrats - they're socialists. And for that reason, I have chosen the title "Conservative Loser" because conservatives have lost in such a way that I doubt they will ever, in my lifetime, control all the branches of government (if they ever did in a party with Jeffords, Snow, Collins, and Chafee).

Vincet Veritas (Truth will conquer) MEB